WASHINGTON ― After a week of internal debate and torment, Democrats looked to put the controversy surrounding Rep. Ilhan Omar’s latest comments behind them, with House lawmakers voting overwhelmingly Thursday to condemn a wide range of hate speech and bigotry in a resolution that was seen as an indirect rebuke of the Minnesota Democrat.
The resolution might have been too indirect for the taste of some Republicans and Democrats, however. The House voted 407-23 to denounce many forms of religious intolerance and racism, with 23 GOP lawmakers opposing the legislation seemingly because it didn’t single out Omar ― though it was hard not to notice that many of the no votes came from some of the most far-right members of Congress.
But it was a saving grace for Democrats that the 23 Republicans decided to vote no on the resolution. (GOP Rep. Steve King of Iowa, who’s had a far lengthier history of problematic statements, was the lone present vote.) They took heat off Democrats during a week in which the Democrats have been unable to quash this story themselves.
The wide-ranging resolution that Omar herself supported simply wasn’t enough for those Republicans, and it might not be enough for some Democrats who wanted a direct reprimand ― or to just finally bury the controversy.
It was a small group of veteran Democrats, after all, who pressured Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) into holding a vote on a resolution, after Omar said recently that she wanted to discuss “the political influence in this country that says it is OK for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country.”
Many saw her comments ― taken in combination with previous remarks ― as a dig against pro-Israel lobbying. But Omar and some other Democrats argue they should have the ability to criticize Israel without fear of being labeled an anti-Semite. Ultimately, Democratic leadership split the difference by voting on a broad resolution that called out “accusing Jews of being more loyal to Israel or to the Jewish community than to the United States” as anti-Semitism, while also deploring multiple forms of Islamophobia and white supremacy.
At the urging of some veteran Democrats ― including Reps. Eliot Engel, Nita Lowey and Jerrold Nadler (all three of whom chair committees, are Jewish and represent districts in New York state) ― Pelosi agreed over the weekend to hold a vote on a resolution. But other Democrats pushed back, arguing that the speaker was playing into the hands of Republicans who have looked to paint Omar as an anti-Semite.
On Wednesday, a closed-door meeting with Democrats turned ugly when some lawmakers began attacking each other. Pelosi actually walked out of the meeting after freshman Rep. Jahana Hayes (D-Conn.) questioned why she had learned about the resolution from MSNBC instead of from House leadership.
With many Democrats taking issue with how their leaders had decided to move forward, those leaders actually considered burying the resolution. But they also worried that doing nothing would drag out the story even longer, potentially allowing Republicans to offer a procedural motion deploring anti-Semitism on Friday, which would distract attention from Democrats passing the long-awaited voting rights bill, H.R. 1.
By Thursday morning, Democratic leadership decided to move ahead with the vote. But they also decided it should be written so broadly that Omar wouldn’t feel singled out. (Omar has received hours of coverage on cable news, been the focus of hundreds of articles and received death threats.)
Still, because the resolution seemed to call out everything, some lawmakers felt it effectively called out nothing.
Rep. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) spoke on the floor Thursday contending that the resolution was inadequate.
“Why aren’t we able to singularly condemn anti-Semitism? Why can’t we call it anti-Semitism and show that we’ve learned the lessons of history?” Deutch said.
He added that it seemed like Congress was only willing to address anti-Semitism in the context of “all forms of hatred.”
“If feels like we can’t say it’s anti-Semitism unless everyone agrees that it’s anti-Semitism,” Deutch said.
“Any attack must be condemned when it’s based on hatred. But when a colleague invokes classic anti-Semitic lies three times, then this body must condemn that anti-Semitism,” he said.
HuffPost also overheard Engel telling Rep. Mike McCaul (R-Texas) on Thursday that the resolution was “ridiculous.” While Engel was more reserved in a later interview, he nonetheless made it clear that he didn’t feel the resolution went far enough.
“I can only talk for me, and I condemned every statement that was made by my colleague, and I will continue to do it if anyone does anything wrong,” Engel said.
Engel later spoke on the floor to say he was voting for the resolution, but regretted there wasn’t a separate measure condemning what Omar said and suggested that he’d work with anyone ― presumably Republicans in the form of a motion to recommit ― to secure a more targeted vote.
Omar has faced an onslaught of criticism from colleagues, both Republicans and Democrats.
On Twitter, Lowey said that lawmakers should be able to debate issues without “prejudice or bigotry,” continuing that she was “saddened” that Omar “mischaracterizes support for Israel.”
Rep. Juan Vargas (D-Calif.) tweeted that he found it “disturbing” that Omar was perpetuating “hurtful anti-Semitic stereotypes,” which in turn earned him a quote tweet from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who asked him to explain his stance that it’s unacceptable to question U.S. foreign policy.
The online back-and-forths prompted Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) to implore her colleagues on Wednesday to quit it. “Everyone stop tweeting!” she said during the closed-door meeting.
On Thursday, Pelosi herself seemed to defend Omar. She said the resolution ― which was initially intended as a rebuke of Omar ― wasn’t about the first-term congresswoman. “It’s about these forms of hatred,” Pelosi claimed.
The speaker said she didn’t think that Omar intended her statement to be “anti-Semitic in any way.” But Pelosi also said that she didn’t think Omar understood “the full weight of the words” and that when the statement was interpreted as anti-Semitic, “we have to remove all doubt.”
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.